Image of Transcatheter vs surgical aortic-valve replacement in lowto intermediate-surgical-risk candidates: A meta-analysis and
systematic review

LITERATURE

Transcatheter vs surgical aortic-valve replacement in lowto intermediate-surgical-risk candidates: A meta-analysis and systematic review


The American and European expert documents recommend transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for inoperable or high-surgical-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. In comparison, efficacy of TAVR is relatively less studied in low- to intermediate-surgical-risk patients. We sought to discover whether TAVR can be as effective as surgical aortic valve replacement
(SAVR) in low- to intermediate-surgical-risk candidates. Four randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and 8 prospective matched studies were selected using PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library (inception: March 2017


Availability

REQJ111-02Titan CenterAvailable

Detail Information

Series Title
-
Call Number
-
Publisher : .,
Collation
-
Language
English
ISBN/ISSN
-
Classification
NONE
Content Type
-
Media Type
-
Carrier Type
-
Edition
-
Subject(s)
Specific Detail Info
Clinical Cardiology. 2017;40:974–981
Statement of Responsibility

Other version/related

No other version available


File Attachment



Information


RECORD DETAIL


Back To Previous